Jump to content

Talk:Huns

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A reconstruction of Attila - image

[edit]

"A reconstruction of Attila by George S. Stuart, Museum of Ventura County." image shows Attila riding a horse with his foot in a stirrup.
The Huns didn't know the stirrup. It was invented by the Magyars. That George S. Stuart didn't know that, well... it's just an artifahrty picture. But using this false image in a supposedly scientific article reveals that the author doesn't have any knowledge of the subject either. From here on the article and it's author have lost all credibility and it become a cyber-rubbish in best case or an anti Hun/Magyar propaganda piece at worst.

Predecessors and Sucessors

[edit]

The huns formed a state, proto-state under Bleda and Attila. Thats the consensus (even if it was a "robbing state")

So, it should have their predecessors and sucessors¡

For predecessors:

-Since the xiong-Nu connection debate will rage for some time, no mention should be done.

-The Alans, conquered by huns

-The Greuthungi, conquered by huns

-The Thervingi, conquered in part by huns

-Roman Pannonia province: base under Attila

-Perhaps lombards, ruggi,sarmatian, and other conquered tribes

Successors:

-After Nedao:

-The kingdom of the Rugii

-The kingdom of the Gepids

-The kingdom of the Ostrogoths

-A suebian kingdom in the danube.

Bolghars, kutrigurs, utrigurs remain speculative, so no for the moment.

Comments?

[edit]

The Hun empire fall apart after Attila's death around 450 AD.
The Magyars - as they call themselves - came into the Carpathian basin around 950 AD.
They DO NOT call themselves HUNs. So why does the west call them HUNgarians after some half-a-thousand years? Surely not because it's easy to identify that they are the same genetic stock with the same culture! Rather invent a confusing 'history' of an unknown nothing-here-move-on story of gobbledygook. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.29.185 (talk) 03:33, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hungary etymology

[edit]

initial H is replaced greek letter digamma (this is very common), so it was originally Wungaria (Mongalia, land of mongols/magyars). Tabascofernandez (talk) 13:25, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add Avars

[edit]

There's basically no mention of the Pannonian Avars in the article even though they were the next major power in the area (and possibly related to the Huns). Can someone please add more of them, at least among the successors and in the lead? 2A01:36D:118:298E:98E6:AB21:75F3:8BFA (talk) 11:31, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]